Showing posts with label ProZ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ProZ. Show all posts

Oct 4, 2014

Drunken monkey needs German to English translator to translate from medieval Czech!



You can always count on ProZ.com, The Translators' Workhouse, for a good laugh. Here is yet another #FAIL by staff to screen job postings properly, with a clueless agency desperately seeking a German to English translator to work on a 9th century Czech document. Best rates only, please!

Such competence speaks for itself and further makes the case for disintermediation. If you want a job done right, go straight to a qualified translator; don't put a put a monkey in the middle.

Aug 31, 2013

The Miracle of Late Language Translation and Modern Quality

This morning a colleague was kind enough to share a link to a thoughtful essay by Italian to English translator Wendell Ricketts, whom I have long considered to be one of the professionals among us with the clearest insight into some of the practical and philosophical problems of current translation practice. In his article Please mind the gap: defending English against 'passive' translation, Wendell describes the train wreck of unprofessional translation into one's later acquired languages quite well.

I particularly like how he distinguishes the cases of limited distribution languages and French, Italian, German and Spanish (FIGS, but be careful before you eat them... dogs have urinated on the low-hanging fruit). There are also some interesting statistics shared, such as
"An average of 59% of ProZ translators into English from Spanish, German, or French are not native-English speakers."
There's an old saying in German about how even with a golden ring an ape remains an ugly creature, and those translating into a language acquired in school or in bed who assume that revisions by a "native speaker" will make the result "all better" would do well to remember that. I've seen what they consider to be acceptable results often enough, and I often see no ugly ape there but at best a gut pile from one which has been too long in the sun :-)

Of course, in an age when charlatans work the conference routes selling snake oil and machine translation "miracles" and conjure quality in a bottle with metrics received on faith from technocrats with little understanding of real language, and presumed reputable purveyors of translation assistance technologies sprinkle themselves liberally with these elixirs and exude their perfume, Wendell's commentary is most likely to be dismissed with a knowing smirk and a learnèd discourse on fit-for-purpose quality and customer satisfaction.

I smile with some pleasure when I hear such Wise Words as low-grade linguistic sausage purveyors and their suppliers would have us believe. There is a certain economic dynamic in the circles of fantasy fandom which may lead them to conclude that they are on the right path, as an individual lemming might think with the comfort of the crowd around him.

Until there comes the cliff on which the skeptical competition will stand and look down on the remains of those who trusted in Common Sense Advice and translators without native language mastery of their target language for critical communication with customers and prospects.

Jul 19, 2013

Can a pig turd be kosher?


The response of grass-eating sheep to the outrageous proposal of scatalogically stupid unilateral rate reductions by our porcine pals at thebigword has revealed that said ovine entities do in fact have a healthy bit of the wolf under those fleeces that the LSP had hoped to shear with their acquiescence.

So much so that the overseers at The Translation Workhouse were overwhelmed with the task of removing comments contrary to Da RuleZ and, in the confusion of battle, even let a contribution from this embedded correspondent slip past the censors despite this earlier warning regarding a reference to my story on the contributions of a generous CEO to feeding the families of translators:


Subject: [ProZ.com Forums] Please, refrain from advertising.

Dear KSL Berlin,

This message is to inform you that your post http://www.proz.com/post/2168957 is not in line with site rule http://www.proz.com/siterules/general/3#3

The post is hidden from public view, but is editable and visible to you. You are kindly requested to edit it in line with this rule, so it can be made visible.

The blog linked to contains adverts.

Unauthorized commercial solicitation, sent via the forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available from ProZ.com in designated areas of the site.

For more info, see: http://www.proz.com/advertising

Thank you in advance for your understanding and future cooperation.

Regards,
Russell Jones
ProZ.com moderator.

Volley after volley was fired in the Blue Board Battlegrounds as Site Staff fought a rearguard action to allow their corporate cash rat to scuttle safely back to its sewer. Exhausted from deleting and disallowing an untold number of black and truthful marks against the market-driven martyrs, the last survivor posted a plea for moderation before collapsing into a caffeine-resistant coma:


But the battle raged on in Twitspace and Facebook (a proud member of the NSA Partner Program), e-mail routes were ambushed and telephone contacts cut and cauterized. Throughout the day, Poop Managers (PMs) tried to deal with what had hit the fan and assure individual translators that their prior rates would be restored, but many were not fooled. Dirt was dug on executive compensation and expenses and thrown up in barricades whose crests were prickly as porcupine backs with bayonets fixed for the next approach of the wavering LSP.

Hold steady, and when you see the whites of their eyes....

Oct 22, 2012

Another translation jobs portal? No thanks.

After I published my recent note on online proZtitution and the race to the bottom on commercial translation portals, I received a polite e-mail from someone who is working to build a better "jobs board" for translation projects. I've received quite a few messages like this in the past four years since I started this blog.

But I fail to see a compelling case for yet another intermediary site for job auctions or anything of that sort.

There is certainly good sense in professional associations with a vetted membership upgrading their directory sites and making them easier for potential clients to find and use, and for some time now I have felt that the leaders of major organizations like the ATA, ITI, IoL, SFT, BDÜ, etc. ought to link their directories and allow better international searches as a counterweight to the less than optimal listings one finds on PrAdZ and other sites.

There's even more sense in individual language service providers improving their online presence in ways that helps prospects find them and recognize a good fit.

The largest commercial portal for translation job auctions has become increasingly irrelevant to all but the low-end commodity market that is probably better off with Gargled Translate given its expectations. The predominance of Indian, Chinese and Eastern European language sausage purveyors (LSPs) on ProZ has driven many serious brokers and service providers elsewhere; a decade ago, even five years ago, a number of interesting inquiries came through that channel, but today they inevitably find me via the BDÜ directory or other channels I more or less control.

So I wish all the aspiring intermediates success with their planned sites and hope they can in fact make a difference in some useful way, but for the most part, translators should look to "home remedies" for curing what may ail their businesses.

Oct 20, 2012

Do proZtitutes make translation easier than ever?

It's surprising how some are surprised when certain online language service auction portalZ hit new lowZ all the time. The latest controversy arose when a German colleague clicked an advertising link (ka-ching for the King, more ad revenue) which displayed something like the following:


This took him to the site of a service provider in India offering to convert and machine translate a variety of file types, creating formatted output, and doing OCR conversion for what some might assume were "reasonable" prices. To convert and machine translate about three scanned pages of double-spaced, typed text (about 1000 words) costs a mere USD 7. Ramalamadingdong, what a deal. Let's forget for a moment that OCR is often a no-brainer job with professional or even second-tier OCR software, and Google Translate and other garbage engines are free or nearly so, and let's not even think about potential issues of confidentiality that too many forget to consider. And then, of course, one can ignore the fact that it sometimes helps to understand the language of the text you are converting if there are decisions to be made about blocks and sequences or corrections to deal with.

The German colleague, who runs a small agency, commented that at the rates quoted, he would have done nicely with the 1.2 million words he converted last night. But he was more worried about other things:


I'm not sure I understand the concern with Ze Zite's reputation; in many eyes it has been disreputable for some time now. That ProZ is now advertising services for low-end garbage services like this is hardly much of an insult on top of the record of its past injuries. This is also entirely consistent with phoax at the commercial portal "certifying" bottomscraper agencies and other amusing stunts.

I don't think he has to worry much about Ze Zite trashing his reputation by association. I'm sure, like any good businessperson, he has developed a number of better channels for acquisition and collaboration and prefers to work with professionals.

Some time ago, I wrote about discussions of a "translator's dream site". I had intended to follow this up with a review of various alternatives I have seen develop in recent years. I don't believe that there is one ideal "site" for all needs. Where you troll for quickie assignments might not be where you feel like a serious technical discussion about your CAT tools, and I hope it's not where you would discuss truly sensitive business matters.

Abandoning the illusion that a for-profit portal with a history of exploitation and pandering to interests at odds with those of freelance translators and other small service providers is a good first step.

After that I would look for the right mix of public and private platforms, both virtual and in the real world: local or national translators associations, Yahoogroups and other online list servers, local business associations or organizations associated with your major areas of interest, regular conferences and trade fairs, private online forums - whatever works best for you as you like to work and interact with clients and peers. I won't presume to say how to go about this, as we each have our own unique strengths, and my way might not work well for you. Some days it doesn't even work for me ;-)

I've found that my personal mix of networking at professional conferences and trade fairs of interest to me, Twitter, Facebook groups like Networking Translators (where a lot of German peers seem to congregate in a chaotic cluster), the forum for BDÜ members and the private forum Stridonium give me a richer, more diverse professional experience than one typically enjoys with PrAdZ.

If you want to support a Zite willing to proZtitute itself with any and all promiscuous promoters of Gargled Translation (however well formatted), be my guest. You are free to choose your market segment within the limits of your abilities. But should you opt for the compelling deal from "Imaginary Solutions" to machine translate your texts, I'm sure your competitors will have kind words for you.

Jun 3, 2012

Ask not what your professional site can do for you....

A recent thread on ProZ asked the question "What would your dream translators' website provide?" That's a question with which quite a few have struggled in recent years. And it's one which I suspect is difficult to answer with a single platform or format.

What is a "translators' website" in the sense discussed in the thread? Many things potentially. I think the definition could be applied fairly to online discussions such as mailserve lists or Yahoogroups forums, various Facebook pages with ongoing professional discussions, private forums for professional associations such as the ATA or BDÜ, refuges out of the reach of search engines for private discussions and terminology advice between colleagues and the whole lot of marketplace portals with their often frustrating mix of useful features and slave auction or red light district character.

The simple fact that this discussion began on the world's largest translation-related portal, a virtual workhouse known not only for the repressive policies of its management but also for its residual usefulness as a repository of contact information for translators with obscure language combinations and the breadth of its offerings to an estimated 20,000 paying members indicates clearly that what is lacking is not definable in a set of specifications for development.

Is a jobs board critical to the theoretical dream site? I think not. Some of the most useful and successful sites I know have none such, and the professionals who spend their time there are familiar enough with how to market themselves. Even those new to the profession would benefit more in the long run from interacting with experienced colleagues in the forums of professional associations and engaging in mentorship programs such as that of the ITI in the UK than they would from years turning tricks in the linguistic alleys of Argentina, New York and Ukraine. Mind you, there is a lot of interesting experience to be gained in those alleys, but the good life and sunny meadows of the profession are elsewhere. The noise level of frustrated newbies - crying over a broken Crados project or asking what information is needed on an invoice and how to set a rate for a job (often after the translation has been delivered!) - is deafening.

So what is the ideal translators' website? I can only answer that question for myself. Your answer may be very different and is just as valid if you are speaking of your own needs. But one principle does seem to apply: the best sites will likely not be free (good programming isn't cheap), and the hidden costs of the ones that are might be considerable. Technical maintenance of a good web-based platform is not trivial; as a former software developer with experience in web development, I would not dare to "diss" the skills required to develop and maintain a site like ProZ or even a much simpler one. No matter how good the team, there will always be glitches to cope with as browser technology evolves or hackers develop new strategies to steal our data and identities.

A recent advertisement I received from a commercial portal struck me by how very much it and other commercial portals are aimed at people with a consumer mentality. The advert even offered “prizes” for becoming a paid member. Reminded me too much of virtual bread and circuses. But as with most aspects of life, the greatest satisfaction is not to be found in consumption, but rather in contribution to a community. If you want to find your perfect site, you must contribute to its creation and evolution. Add value to your translators’ site as you are able, and you will likely find much more in return,

The very public character of the professional lives some of us lead can be a real problem. I've had my identity hijacked twice that I know of off the ProZ site (though the problems were handled quite satisfactorily by the management once the scope of things became clear), and until I began using a pseudonym there, the amount of search index spam created by the site's language instance strategy (indexing every page in every language one can think of regardless of what language the content is actually written in) was drowning out more important information I tried to make available on the web. I've seen stolen resumés re-used with other names and other mis-use of data.

Public discussions can also be good... or rather bad... for business. Some of those who vent about a particular client might not be aware that said client monitors their posts on ProZ or Twitter. I say some rather tactless things in public, but I do so with a full awareness of where those words might be read. Not everyone thinks about this. Or they think about it a lot and fear to ask for help when they need it or offer a suggestion, because they don't want to look "stupid". So really, privacy would seem to be important.

Privacy is one of the features of my professional association's member site (mein.bdue.de). And of many others. But in a large organization like the BDÜ (about 7000 members I think), the volume of traffic can be overwhelming. I'm not a guy for big parties and noisy events - my hearing difficulties usually cause me to seek a quiet place where I can have an enriching discussion with a limited circle of very good people. I do the same for the translators' sites that get most of my attention.

It's important for me to keep an overview and not feel like I'm lost in a crowd at the circus. Important to know whom I communicate with and that this person is worthy of respect for his or her character and professional competence. Important to know that the discussions I have with these people stay private or in a limited circle of our choosing. While this can probably be done ad hoc in some way with Google+ (if you feel you can trust Google Not To Be Evil), I like the structure of a programmed site. I need discussion forums with a decent structure and usable search function, and I need a means of seeking and offering help on critical terminology issues completely out of the reach of Google and Bing or other indexing services. This is not completely achievable using the social network sites with which I am familiar.
 
As professionals engaged in an activity which often requires a great breadth of knowledge, research skills and access, we will never find everything we need in one place. But if we have one place, one good place, where we can share our questions and ideas securely and respectfully, it may be easier to find those many other places when we need them.

Some of what we seek in online platforms may really be better found in the physical world. I have found that all the webinars and podcasts I have heard seldom reach me as well as personal attendance at a conference lecture or local workshop. Discussions at my monthly Stammtisch are usually more enriching than threads on a discussion board, and the food shared at the table beats an apple and coffee at my desk. Of course I can’t be everywhere with all those with whom I would like to share my professional life, but I probably could be in more places and be better for it.

Nonetheless, the online world has become a critical element in the lives of a great many translators, and this dependency will most likely increase in the years ahead. So some thought – and action – regarding the kinds of translators’ sites  we need is worth the investment in our futures.

Jun 1, 2012

memoQ 6: more power under the hood

Yesterday, Kilgray held its virtual memoQ Day on ProZ. Given what a disaster the ProZ online conference interface was in the first virtual conference I attended long ago, I had no intention of looking in, but since this was the first occasion on which the new version 6 of memoQ was to be presented in public, I decided to "visit" after all. The format and management have improved since my last experience with these virtual conferences, and it was definitely worth the time. I encourage those with access to the recordings of the sessions to see what's on offer; there may be many things of value. Despite over 1000 participants during the day, the event worked well.

The memoQ 6 presentation was in the evening for the Central European time zone, so I did not catch that session live. The day was long enough before then. When I did look at it, I was pleased to see confirmation of may useful changes I had heard about and see a live demo of many more I had not expected. Given that the software is still pre-beta, I expect there will be a number of changes and additions before the release, so I will simply share my impressions using the list of running feature notes I kept and a few screenshots I made. And a few addenda from conversations at memoQfest 2012.

  • A smaller footprint – previous versions of memoQ suffered increasingly from “bloat”. (That statement reveals an attitude I like - SDL, which takes up about ten times as much space and uses more resources, does not seem to be similarly inclined to streamline.)
  • Vastly improved scalability and handling of large files and large numbers of files. Speed improvements of an order of magnitude in many cases.
  • memoQ 6 has added support for binary MS Office (DOC & XLS) formats – and can be used without MS Office being installed. This new functionality also includes the server APIs for sophisticated, automated workflows – no more manual saving to RTF or DOCX, etc.
  • TM corruption problems have been decreaseda and can no longer crash servers; servers generate diagnostic exports for better troubleshooting
  • Improved concordance functions – no more result count error, additional viewing format. LiveDocs can now be opened from the concordance and edits/corrections can be made to TMs from the concordance window.Meta data can now be used as sorting and filtering criteria in the concordance.
  • "Content connectors" now in the Translator Pro edition to watch folders and automate operations such as file imports and statistics in projects
  • Versioning features will be identical in the Translator Pro and Project Manager editions. Now anyone can create a comparison view of two source versions.
  • Preferred languages will be added to the top of selection lists, saving time. This is a major improvement over the previous workaround of hacking the XML configuration file.
  • Translation results can be ordered by preference
  • The horizontal editing option has been changed to "pin" the segment being translated in the middle of the text view
  • Spelling checks for locked rows
  • Confirm locked & proofread segments in TM
  • A new QA warning shows TM matches not used
  • 4 new MT engines integrated
  • Several new server workflows, including "cattle calls" and one with a subvendor group to maintain translator/reviewer anonymity from the higher level service provider
  • Enterprise IT integration: Active Directory integration, proxy support, security protocols
  • memoQ 5 & 6 can co-exist, and each needed for the respective servers; opening a mQ5 project will migrate it to mQ6 (create an upgraded *copy* of your project). This actually sucks. There should be middleware to ensure that any client version of memoQ can talk to any server version. The current incompatibilities cause too many headaches.
  • Inconsistent translations can be extracted directly into a view in the QA module! This feature saves a regular memoQ view combined from as many documents as were checked.
  • An AUTOSUGGEST feature which mines resources to suggest target content
  • TMX as a translation document format (this has interesting possibilities for TM maintenance).
This list of notes is by no means an exhaustive representation of what we can expect in about a month. And I do believe there are a number of other interesting things scheduled for minor releases in the months to follow. The progress Kilgray has made with the "refactored" version of memoQ will benefit everyone and surely inspire further rounds of "Follow the Leader" with the competition.


There are introductory webinars for memoQ 6 scheduled in June. See Kilgray's schedule for details and sign up.

Jan 30, 2012

Put on de Red Pee fo da agency

When I received a message from a colleague that ProZ had begun "certifying" translation agencies with the dreaded red Plob, I thought she was joking. There are real certifications for serious businesses, verifying that their documented procedures are orderly and traceable among other things. These include ISO 9001 and EN 15038, and the more ambitious agencies usually seek these because they are required for business with some large clients or RFPs. Surely no serious translation agency would feel the need to be "certified" by The Translation Workhouse with its increasingly debased standards. Well, once again, I have learned that human greed and folly have depths which even my cynicism cannot plumb. If one goes to the ProZ home page but is not logged in, the link to these "certified" proZtitution agencies is visible. I followed it and found a list of corporate members, some well known, some with the Plob.

What, I wonder, is being certified here? I am familiar with ISO 9001 and EN 15038, and I can't really imagine a lot of value that would be added here. But perhapZ the SiteStaff have developed important and relevant criteria, such as testing the timeliness of bank transfers for a specified amount. Both end customers and freelance translators would benefit from knowing that an agency using ProZ has been verified as a registered business with a working bank account.

So KudoZ to the phoax at Ze Zite for distinguishing such select translation service resellers (TSRs) as:




Jan 17, 2012

Are professional organizations worth the bother?

There are two broad categories of professional organizations potentially of interest to language professionals such as interpreters and translators: those which are intended specifically for providers of language services, such as freelance translator and interpreters, and those which are not. The latter, which would include chambers of commerce, business clubs, technical societies such as the American Chemical Society and so on are clearly of great value. They are a means to stay abreast of new developments in areas of interest (perhaps an earlier profession) and perhaps to meet potential direct clients.

What about the other kind, professional associations for editors, translators, interpreters, terminologists and other language-slinging rabble? Well, as one reader from Putinland commented on my post about finding good translators, she saw no single benefit to her membership in that country's largest translators' association. She was aghast at the idea that someone might cancel a ProZ membership, because she assumed that corporate clients would not look for professionals but instead would only work with agencies, and these agencies in turn would cast their nets at The Translators Workhouse. (I looked up Cravy's profile at The Workhouse and when I saw the wealth of information there, it was hard to imagine how agencies would not be dueling each other for the opportunity to offer her work. But that is not the right profile - see the comments. That is an ongoing problem with ProZ and other portals - anyone can set up a profile under nearly any name or pseudonym, with no verification that the person behind the registered e-mail address is real. This is why the portals are often playgrounds for scamsters.)

Fortunately, the real world isn't quite as Dickensian as that, though perhaps a bit darker and more Satanic at the wordface in some parts of the world. But King Henry's sockpuppet is partly right: all organizations are not created equal. They exist in a particular social context of the countries in which their members live or do business, and they are very much dependent on the efforts of their members.

The professional translators' organization of which I am a member, the German BDÜ, can be a real mixed bag at times; one fellow I know who places enormous value on professional conduct quit his local chapter in disgust a few years ago, referring to it as the Hessian Housewives' Association. Since then, however, he has come back and contributed to the serious business focus of his state chapter, and across Germany the organization offers first-rate continuing education seminars, free legal counseling, affordable liability insurance, an excellent private forum for members to exchange information and job requests, a superb online search tool for translators and their specialties and more. To say that I get my money's worth out of membership would be a huge understatement. I don't have to like everything the BDÜ does, but I applaud a great deal of it.

As I was compiling the list of professional organizations for freelance translators and interpreters which provide online search tools for potential clients to find a service provider, I was a little shocked at how parochial and unprofessional some of these venerable organizations appear on the Internet sites. In a discussion of that list on a private site, one colleague commented that it is a shame there isn't some sort of meta search engine to serve up the data from a great number of professional sites around the globe. I'm not really sure that would be a good thing if it were possible, and a quick look at the search tools for a few of the association sites quickly makes it clear that a programmer attempting such a task would soon turn to the bottle. There is no consistency at all in the lists of specialties used; some organizations simply list members in a given region with no statement of the types of text they feel they are fit to translate. Appalling.

I think that attracting an international clientele is important to many translators in this age; for those living in countries with developing economies, this is one of the keys to the best rates. But in order to do that, it is necessary to offer the site in languages which are probably understood by potential international clients. The Germans do it. So do the French. The Swiss and Italian associations I looked at failed this test. If you are a member of a professional association for language service providers, has your association given due attention to this point? If not, get out the thumbscrews or find and organization that does. (That's called "voting with your feet", an option familiar enough to some who live in parts of the world where that is the only effective vote.)

Linking online search engines for the associations would require using the same list of specialties or at least subsets thereof to be effective. But what chance of that is there with an organization that feels it is important to list beekeeping but nothing to do with chemistry or chemical technology? Quite a lot, I'm sure. Unifying and merging search tools might be a good project for groups like the Canadian umbrella organization I listed. I was not happy to see that I would have to go to each individual state organization to do my search. Really!

This is the 21st century, but some organizations for language specialists seem to be stuck in the 19th. The disorganization one can see in some areas, even in developed countries where one might expect better, make it obvious why even a highly flawed commercial portal that many serious professionals avoid like herpes can be a "success". But fortunately, there are some organizations, big ones, that get it and offer a hunting ground that is generally happier than the portalZ with their spotty or non-existent identity verifications for members and silly aliases. Mind you, I eventually adopted an alias myself on ProZ, but that was to avoid having information I wanted to present about myself or my business get buried in spammy pages repeating my commentary for Tamil, Swahili, Tagalog, Urdu and other languages at the center of the world stage.

So are these professional organizations for language service providers such as freelance translators, interpreters and editors worthwhile? Definitely. If you choose the right one.

Jan 9, 2012

How low can ProZ go?

Since The Great Moderator Purge at ProZ a few years ago, things have continued to get curiouser and curiouser, and The Translation Workplace has evolved into more of a Translation Workhouse, or as some colleagues from former Iron Curtain regions who have the historical background to comment authoritatively might put it, a gulag. One from which, thankfully, most serious translators in the major language pairs have escaped to a better life. After being gagged there for several years and dealing with other nonsense, I stopped being a paying member of the site in 2011. The experience of this German colleague provides further confirmation that I made the right decision. For years, there have been rumors, some quite plausible, others less so, of corruption in the Blue Board ratings, and for some, access to this data remains one of the few justifications for membership. But if the ratings themselves are skewed by arbitrary actions... let her story, posted on another translators' forum and reposted here with permission, speak for itself:
Hey folks,
I know I don't need to tell you how bad ProZ is for the industry, and I don't want to turn this into a discussion about that site, but if you need a little story to convince others to stop supporting ProZ with their money, here's a funny one from today.

A while ago I did one project for an agency that turned out to be a typical broker. Absolutely no QA, low rates (earlier, they were looking for a 50K legal translation within 2 days for 0.09 USD/word - without adding any value to the project themselves), and so on. The project was small enough for me to use as a test to determine if I wanted to continue working with this guy. After all, he had 30 5-star ratings on the Blue Board.

But as it turned out, my initial feeling was correct: he sent me three emails way before the deadline asking me when I would deliver, but when it came to paying me with equal speed after timely delivery, the excuses and bossy behavior began. He said I should be happy about getting paid after 30 days because that is supposedly "GREAT" in our industry, and he declared that he was under no obligation to pay me when I wanted to be paid, etc.

So, long story short, I went to ProZ to leave a negative rating. My review included all necessary information and described my experience. I didn't mention any names, nor did I use foul language or similar.

First attempt: my review got censored and deleted without any explanation. I sent a support request and asked what was going on. Got a reply that told me to resubmit my review.
Second attempt: I resubmitted my review, and removed the word "arrogant" from it, just to be sure. It got censored and deleted again, without any explanation.
Third attempt: I simply selected one star and added "Not recommended." to the comment field. It got censored and deleted again. This time, I received an email telling me that I was not allowed to add any comments and should only indicate my WWA rating.
Fourth attempt: I simply gave a 1-star rating and added no further explanation. [This was finally let through.]

WTF?? If you see a bad rating, don't you want to know why the rating is so bad? Leaving a bad rating without any explanation makes the translator look bitter and vengeful. And why are comments allowed for the good ratings then?

Anyway, I'm happy I don't waste my money on Proz, and I'll cheer for everyone who stops paying for their membership. If you want to share this story with paying members, feel free to do so. :-)
Verra interesting.

Jan 7, 2012

Social media: a waste of time?

In the past few years, a number of friends and colleagues have informed me quite indignantly what an utter waste social media are, a few implying that participation in platforms such as blogs and Twitter is simply filler for those without work. I'm sure that may be true in some individual cases, but my personal experience and observations tell a very different story.

My involvement began some years ago in translators forums while doing research for writing projects and expanded to blogs and private forums when the deterioration of ProZ as a public forum for professional discussion drove most of the serious professionals away or gagged them. While Twitter was still derided as a tool for keeping the world updated on your breakfast and bowel movements, I discovered that it was fast becoming one of the most efficient tools for the quick exchange of tips and professional tidbits among serious professionals. Facebook? Well, I don't like the shifting ground of the company's information policies, but used judiciously, even that platform has socially redeeming value.

The value of all these platforms will vary according to one's goals and the overall balance sought. But let there be no doubt: social media are valuable and sometimes surprisingly effective. I've had a very large number of financially worthwhile projects result from the the time spent sharing information, but more importantly, I have been able to get to know great professionals in distant places, sometimes help them and receive help in return. Maybe some day I'll throw out a few statistics or examples from my experience, but today I would like to share an inspiring example from two colleagues in the US and Austria, the Jenner twins.

At Christmas time, they issued an appeal for assistance for the co-founder of the Nevada Interpreters and Translators Association, Álvaro Degives-Más, who has given so much to help others in our profession. Hoping to raise a few hundred dollars to help him and his wife defray crushing expenses from uninsured surgeries, in two weeks, the generosity of colleagues and a few companies has yielded over 7500 dollars. A small part of the total bills, mind you, but an impressive achievement nonetheless, made possible through the power of social media. Read the update here, and if you are able to, please consider doing a small bit to help these people see a light at the end of a very dark tunnel.

Sep 7, 2011

Have you considered applying for the Certified PRO Network?


Dear test123,

From the information available in your profile, I see that you offer translation services in German to English, a language pair that is currently under-represented in the ProZ.com Certified PRO Network. In the first part of this year, 1312 jobs in German to English were posted at ProZ.com, but there were only 104 members in the Certified PRO Network to respond to them. As you can see, then, this might represent an excellent growth opportunity for you.

If you would like to be included in the Certified PRO Network and increase your opportunities to meet clients at ProZ.com while distinguishing yourself as a professional, please complete your application here:


Make sure you also watch this short video on how to complete your application before submitting your application for review: http://www.proz.com/videos/Tutorials%20on%20ProZ.com/746

Find out more about the ProZ.com Certified PRO Network here: http://www.proz.com/pro-tag/info/about

Looking forward to welcoming you to the network!

Kind regards,

Maria Kopnitsky
ProZ.com Certified PRO Network

ProZ.com
The translation workhouse
-------------------------
ProZ.com Headquarters
P.O. Box 903
Syracuse, NY 13201 USA

The preceding letter was copied exactly from the mail forwarded to me by a former ProZ moderator. The account "test123" is a testing profile set up years ago to explore certain new features of the site. He and I are both amused and puzzled by the invitation for a nonentity to join the fabled red pee network. If it is in fact true that there are only 104 "approved" red bubbles (as he calls them) for a language combination as common as German to English, it makes you wonder what's up. I know there has been a huge exodus of talent from the platform, especially in European countries where the disregard of data privacy and security concerns runs strongly counter to laws and expectations. In fact, a lot of the best translators I know for German and English are no longer ProZ members, and outsourcers who restrict their listings to the membership or the red bubbled ones are simply shutting themselves away from a lot of the best talent now.

It's also clear that these invitation processes are not personally reviewed by those responsible. I really can't imagine that Ms. Kopnitsky believes that "test123" is even a serious alias. Many of us now use aliases on PrAdZ to keep the search index trash for repetitive content in Tamil and god-knows-how-many-other languages from burying real content we rely on for professional publicity. But "test123"? It takes a special kind of faith to believe in that.

Aug 25, 2011

Kicking the habit

My daughter turned 18 yesterday, and I decided to celebrate the occasion in a healthy way by ending another unhealthy relationship: my ProZ membership, which was due for renewal that day. Over the past few years, it has become clear that the relationship with the self-designated leading e-portal for translators was an abusive one.

When Mr. Qaddafi, a junior military officer, staged his coup in Libya some 40+ years ago, things were better at first. Roads were built. Schools. Hospitals. Then the Road to Nowhere with its master plan in the Green Book.

When a Japanese translator and MIT graduate founded ProZ and built it with the help of skilled, enthusiastic professionals and others pleased to have a new communication platform with a bit more to offer than creaky Compuserve, there was a honeymoon period with competent moderation of forums, helpful exchanges of ideas and terminology advice and more. And then, when the Ring of RuleZ was forged and darkness fell on the virtual land, nontranslating nazgul redefined right and wrong and wrote the platform's end as a unique and useful place for professionals.

ProZ has always been an easy "fix" for me. A lot of good colleagues complain that in years of quoting posted jobs there they had no success. I have other beefs with ProZ - mostly bad management. As far as the posted projects are concerned, I probably got 70% or better of those for which I choose to quote and did so at quite reasonable rates. It's all a matter of knowing when to quote and how to game the system. And having qualifications that are in demand. If your tail gets in the way of your typing and you munch peanuts and bananas over the keyboard, even Jeff Gitomer probably can't help you upsell your services.

But those little fixes of money and ego boosts of yet another easy score have stood in the way of more serious development, and like someone with Stockholm Syndrome in a violent relationship, I've found excuses for years now to stick around ProZ long after Henry & Co. applied duct tape to my mouth and required individual approval of any forum contributions I might care to make. I'm in good company there - many of the best moderators from the past have been similarly gagged for a long time, and some have been subject to summary virtual execution. I am talking about some of the most ethical, honest, competent colleagues I know.

So it's time for a bit of methadone (free account status) on the transition to a better life in healthier company. I've found it already, actually, in professional associations like the German BDÜ and private, non-indexed forums with carefully screened professionals like Stridonium. Why would I need the ProZ needle in my arm, to put up with an organization that shows open contempt for paying customers with an opinion as it debases its content for wannabes and Asian sausage shop LSPs? Why continue to host a domain there when the costs are far higher than elsewhere and the service truly sucks? Let it go. Time to kick the habit.

Jun 27, 2011

Mission drift

Off to a late start after a torrid night of term extraction with the memoQ 5.0 beta, I scanned the tweets of the morning as I munched a cheese roll and gulped my Milchkaffee. The announcement of the new ProZ Gift Shop stirred a little curiosity as yet another sign of the platform's greater openness to experiment than a participant in a Haight Ashbury orgy around 1969. This time it seems that the German language at least got roundly screwed:

ProZ.com Geschenkeladen

Willkommen auf der ProZ.com Geschenkeladen. Hier finden Sie einige Fun-Produkten mit den ProZ.com-Logo. Bring ProZ.com von Ihrem Bildschirm zu Hause oder im Büro!

Auf der Suche nach Bücher über Übersetzung und darauf, ein freiberuflicher Übersetzer? Seien Sie sicher, dass Sie ProZ.com 's Books Abschnitt.

Besuchen Sie die Bücher section>>

Laden Sie eine kostenlose ProZ.com Wallpaper für Ihren Desktop
et cetera

The general consensus seems to be that some idiot used MT for the text as opposed to dropping acid for an enhanced translation experience. Even stoned it's hard to screw up a translation that badly assuming that you have some reasonable grasp of the language.

While I applaud the perpetual willingness of Henry & Co. to broaden their business horizons within the confines of their ideology and find even this diversion with dog dishes and teddy bears to have some redeeming social value, I am disappointed once again at the utter lack of regard shown for core principles of the profession off which the platform feeds, to wit: quality and accuracy. With various mechanisms available on the ProZ platform to identify translators and assign texts like this to them, or even to make use of crowdsourcing options as has been done in the past, it is truly curious how this could be fouled up so thoroughly. I wonder what other languages look like.

I wonder if the founder and staff, who consistently show an endearing geeky attraction to technology over legal or social appropriateness, have been drinking a little much of the L10n Kool Aid which causes so many to hallucinate about a future of Translating Machines of Ever Loving Grace and the post-editors who serve them.

I actually like the idea of a bit of merchandising on the platform, though I find the prices a bit appalling. Anything that helps pay the overhead of the server infrastructure in an ethical way is welcome as I see it, but for what ProZ aspires to be there are a few basics which ought to be kept in mind. Instead of drifting aimlessly through the waters of platform experimentation and hitting the obvious rocks shown here, the responsible parties should steer their way to competent members and work out a deal for service that won't further degrade the platform's reputation for quality and drive customers off in disgust.

Jun 17, 2011

Kilgray offers memoQ special until June 23rd

A 40% discount on memoQ translator pro licenses is available until June 23rd, 2011 as part of a group purchase on ProZ.com. That translates to 372 EUR / 462 USD, significantly less than similar offers in recent weeks from competitors.

One day into the special offer, which began yesterday, more than half the allocated software licenses have been ordered. This is an excellent price and an opportunity to acquire the tool which is currently the most versatile, easy-to-master translation support environment for freelancers. Given the rapid pace at which the memoQ Server is capturing market share among translation agencies and companies who deal with large translation volumes, there are also increasing numbers of outsourcers looking for translators who work with memoQ. Kilgray's legendary support for all classes of customers is one of the biggest reasons for this growth, though the company's leadership in introducing revolutionary features for reference management, compatibility with other tools and - in the upcoming version 5.0 - terminology management surely plays a role in the success of memoQ as well.

If you have questions regarding this group purchase or Kilgray's products, they can be submitted via this contact form. One question I can answer here - the deal does, of course, include a free upgrade to memoQ 5.0, scheduled for publication as a release candidate at the end of this month, with the "official" release expected in mid-July.

Those interested in a preview of the cool new terminology features and other stuff in memoQ 5.0 should join the free webinar on June 20th. Another webinar introducing memoQ 5.0 is scheduled for July 5th.

Jun 6, 2011

The Compleat Translator

This was a theme I suggested to Steffen Walter many months ago when planning for this year's annual powwow in Berlin began. I had in mind a series of small presentations on various bits of hardware and software that might constitute a complete and functional - and possibly mobile - translator's office. Due to a busy schedule and general mental malaise as I reoriented myself in a new life and new surroundings, I didn't add anything to the original suggestion, and when later I saw that a presentation of Dragon Naturally Speaking was planned, I breathed a sigh of relief that this year's meeting would be another where I could simply relax and mingle with good people whom I see too seldom as well as meet interesting new ones.

Translator's luck struck as it often does, and on the afternoon of the first day of the gathering, the presenter's laptop died, and I was asked to step in and give the talk I never prepared. Since I never really prepare talks anyway, I agreed to do so, and after the first night's bacchanal at Restaurant Lei e Lui in Berlin-Moabit, I hit the couch hard and awoke groggy early the next morning to feed the chickens and organize some notes for speaking later that day. I had been asked to speak in German, something I don't do much of these days, and when I do I usually make more extensive notes than I would for a presentation in English, then gradually distill these down to a few points on an index card as I review and reconsider what to say. There was no time for any of this, unfortunately.

When I pulled out the A4 pages on which I had printed the draft text for my talk, I realized that I couldn't read it without glasses. Even with glasses it wasn't so easy. Ah, the joys of growing old. I had a horrible vision of hunching over my illegible, ungrammatical notes and squinting, struggling to choke out inchoate bits of advice presumed to have some greater, though undiscernible context. As it was, fear gripped me full by the throat and the evil spirits of SDL and others possessed me and spoke through me. What was actually said in that session is unknown to me (age, chronic memory dysfunction), though I have been able to reconstruct some of it via Twitter (#pwberlin11), and it occasionally bears some relationship to the original notes.

Below I've copied my original notes in German for those who wish to marvel at how badly I write the language after so many years of sneaking around with it; I've included a few additional comments in English on things I remembered, might possibly have added or heard from others during the session. My apologies to those who suffer with the length of my posts: this one will be worse than usual.

The talk was delivered without slides or audiovisual aids, just a few pieces of paper and a sleeping dog on whom I tried not to step.

*****



Heute werdet ihr „Kevin unplugged“ erleben: die wichtigsten Aspekte der Technologie und des Übersetzerlebens kann man auch ohne Rechner und PowerPoint vorführen und besprechen.

Den Titel des heutigen Vortrags hatte ich vor Monaten vorgeschlagen als ich an die häufigen Fragen von Anfägern bei ProZ gedacht habe. Dort sind man immer wieder Grundfragen zur Ausstattung und notwendige Schritte, um das eigene Geschäft nachhaltig zu machen. Gedacht habe ich damals an eine Übersicht der technologischen Möglichkeiten. Da diese aber ohne die menschliche Komponente wenig taugen oder sogar schädlich sind, werden wir auch von nichttechnologischen Aspekten reden.

Vorab muß ich aber betonen, was alle erfahrene professionelle Übersetzer wohl wissen: der Weg zum nachhaltigen Erfolg ist kein Weg, sondern ein Netwerk von Pfaden, die unterschiedliche Abenteuer und Möglichkeiten anbieten. Der von mir gewählte Pfad ist nicht Dein Pfad, aber vielleicht können meine Erfahrungen und Erläuterungen dazu als Denkanstosse dienen, womit Du – womit wir – manche Stolpersteine vermeiden können.

Reden wir erstmal von

I. Hardware
 
Dass ein Rechner heute zur Grundausstattung des Übersetzers gehört ist wohl klar. Aber nicht nur einen Rechner soll das sein, sondern mindestens zwei. Voll ausgestattet, arbeitsfähig und am Besten synchronisiert. Selbst sehr erfahrene Leute in der Branche ignorieren dieses Prinzip, und das kann teuer werden, insbesondere wenn lukrative Jobs durch Versagen eines Rechners zum Teil oder im Ganzen verloren gehen.

Meines Erachtens sollte mindestens einer dieser Rechner mobil sein, also ein Notebook. Aber bald wird es klar, dass es besser zwei Notebooks sein sollte; der mobile Einsatz ist für mache so unentbehrlich, dass auch dieser durch das Redundanzprinzip zu schützen gilt.

Wie groß das Bildschirm sein soll und sonstige Aspekte ist eine Entscheidung, die jeder anders treffen wird, da unsere Bedürfnisse und sehe Vermögen unterschiedlich sind. Das wichtige Prinzip hier ist Sicherheit durch Redundanz und Mobilität, also zwei mobile Rechner oder mehr. Ob statische Rechner (sogennannte Desktops) dabei sein sollen ist auch eine Geschmackssache. Diese finde ich heutzutage persönlich unnutz.
(A quick poll of those present revealed that about half no longer work with a desktop computer at all but rely entirely on laptops of various kinds. Also, one participant pointed out the disadvantages of having a second computer for emergency purposes: this defeats the restful purpose of having a computer fail in the first place, since one has no excuse not to continue working.)
Ein zweiter, unentbehrlicher Aspekt der Hardware-Ausrüstung ist das Telefon. In dieser Hinsicht habe ich Herrn Herbert Fipke viel zu verdanken. Sein Vortrag vor zwei Jahren bei diesem Powwow zu mobilen Telefondiensten, Kosten sparen und Flexibilität gewinnen hat mein Leben in mancher Hinsicht verändert und verbessert und mir ein Haufen Geld gespart. In diesem Bereich tut sich vieles. Wegen meiner Technologieallergie habe ich nur ein sehr einfaches Wegwerftelefon, dass ich u.U. bei der Schweinejagd im Sumpf fallen lassen kann. Aber ich denke, Smartphones – richtig eingesetzt – sind heute auch eine Technologie, die befreiend zum erfolgreichen Übersetzerleben beitragen können. Und da es jetzt eine Smartphoneschnittstelle für mein Projektmanagementsystem (OTM) gibt, werde ich mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit in den kommenden Monaten ein iPhone kaufen, damit ich Projektanfragen und Emails abrufen kann.

Und ich würde auch mobiles Internetzugang über SIM-Geräte, ob Telefone oder Sticks in diese Kategorie (Telefonie) als unentbehrlich einorden. Ich benutze Vodafone und O2/Fonic und Blau als Prepaid – für absolut alles. Kein Telekom, kein Arcor, dank Herbert.

Für Reisen habe ich auch ein Skype-Abonement womit ich von jedem europäischen Land mit meinem Netbook umsonst telefoniere.
An understanding of current mobile telephony options and equipment that can be used with any SIM card in any county is liberating and cost-saving. It really pays to investigate this stuff.
Ein Rechner, ein Telefon, mobiles Internet. Welche Hardware gehört noch dazu? Drucker natürlich, da würde ich auch vorschlagen, ein Scanner dabei zu haben. Wenn Hardcopy vorkommt, was je nach Tatigkeitsbereich oft oder nie sein kann, ist Scannen mit anschießender Texterkennung sehr nützlich. Multifunktionsgeräte sind heute gut und billig. Für einige hundert Euro hat man schon ein Topgerät!

Was ist mit Fax? Habe ich zwar noch, aber die Tendenz ist so, dass das wohl besser virtell abzuwicken ist mit einer Nummer, die eingehende Nachrichtungen in Email-Anhänge verwandelt. Ausgehend gibt es Faxtreiber in Software bzw. Scanner – alles andere ist Luxus.
Scanners and OCR are also critical to the use of CAT tools for better quality assurance of translation assignments received as hardcopies or scans.
Das war’s für Hardware. 

II.    Die Softwarewelt ist relativ eindeutig.

Kaum einer kann heute bestreiten, dass sogenannte CAT-Tools wichtig für praktische Arbeit sind. Es geht um weit mehr hier als Wiederholungen, wie einige noch glauben – die besten CAT-Tools heute ermöglichen bessere Terminologiearbeit, Referenztexteinsatz und vieles mehr. Und die Möglichkeit, mit vielen Ausgangsformaten in einer einheitlichen Umgebung zu arbeiten. Diese entwickeln sich immer weiter als Werkzeuge für Datenmanagement, und das kommende Jahr wird von Kilgray und anderen viele schöne Dinge mit sich bringen.

Hier empfehle ich einfach memoQ als Hauptwerkzeug. Andere können und sollen oft unterstützende Rollen für Datenvorbereitung oder QS spielen. Warum memoQ? Nicht wegen der führenden Technologie, die jetzt in mancher Hinsicht das Vorbild für die Entwicklung bei SDL und anderen darstellt. Sondern wegen Support. No man is an island. Oft kommen Probleme vor, Probleme die auch von einem wie ich mit 4 Jahrzehnten IT-Erfahrung nur schwer zu lösen sind, und das Support-Team bei Kilgray gibt auch zu Unzeiten beste Unterstützung. So was findet man nicht bei SDL, wenn man nicht gerade persönlich mit Paul Filkin zu tun hat.
memoQ will make your translating life easier, and if it doesn't, Kilgray's support will.
Nur eine ergänzende Software werde ich hier noch erwähnen: OCR-Software. Investiere hier in richtige, gute Software für Texterkennung; das lohnt sich. Das ist meht als Textextrahierung, wie man bei vielen sogenannten PDF-Konvertierern findet; diese sind mit gescannten PDFs völlig wertlos. Kauft euch eine Abby FineReader-Lizenz am besten und lernt alle Einstellungen. Und für Kunden ohne editierbaren Ausgangstext stelle den konvertierten Text bei der Lieferung bereit und in Rechnung. So habe ich etliche Tausende Euro hinzuverdient. 

Eine weitere Kategorie, die zur kompletten Ausrüstung des vollarbeitsfähigen Übersetzers gehört ist Projektmanagementsoftware. Viele kennen Tools wie Translation Office 3000 von AIT; für mich stellt das ein absolutes Minimum dar. Diese sollen auch gleich am Anfang für Angebotserstellung und Auftragserfassung eingesetzt werden; richtig gemacht, und am Ende eines langen stressigen Projektes kann man dann meistens auf Knopfdruck die Rechnung erstellen.

Hier gehe ich aus diversen Gründen ein Schritt weiter als die Meisten: mein System für Projektmanagement, Angebotserstellung, Rechnungsgenerierung, Lieferung und Kommunikation mit Kunden und mitwirkenden Übersetzern ist im Internet verfügbar. Dadurch habe ich viel größere Sicherheit – wenn bei mir ein Rechner versagt oder geklaut wird, geht alles an irgendeinem anderen Rechner weiter. Einige Infobroschüren habe ich mitgebracht; sie liegen dort auf dem Tisch.

Vor allem hat sich auch die sichere, verschlüsselte Datenübertragung bei manchen hochwertigen Kunden bewahrt, aber das Wichtigste ist die Verfügbarkeit von jedem Standort mit Internetzugriff sowie alle Agenturfunktionen  für Vermittlung von Aufträgen, usw. nach Bedarf. 

So hat man alles, was man wirklich braucht, um als mobiler Übersetzer in der heutigen Wellt volltauglich zu sein.

Was braucht man noch? 

III.   Kommunikation und Netzwerke

Für ein langfristig stärkeres, nachhaltigeres Geschäft sind professionelle Netzwerke sehr wichtig. Ein Beispiel haben wir hier heute – die Möglichkeit, mit Kollegen auszutauschen. Aber man sollte auch aus vielen Gründen die Mitgliedschaft in Organisationen wie die BDÜ, ITI, ATA usw. anstreben. Das habe ich persönlich anfangs als Witz gemacht, aber die Qualität der Kundenanfragen über die Verzeichnisse dieser Organisationen allein berechtigt alle Kosten. Dazu kommen noch gute Weiterbildungsseminare und nützliche Informationen zu gängigen Honoraren usw.

Wer ist hier BDÜ Mitglied? Und Mitglied in anderen Organisationen? Was hat das für einen Unterschied für Dich gemacht?
More than half the attendees were members of a professional organization of some sort, a few were in professional groups outside the realm of translation and interpreting. More of that would be good for direct customer relations as well as continuing education in special areas. The experience of a number present confirmed that the quality of inquiries coming via contacts from these organizations' directories is generally very high. A copy of a past BDÜ rate survey was circulated as an example of the valuable information members receive.
Und jetzt kommen wir zu dem wichtigsten Element für den Compleat Translator:

IV.   ein Leben außerhalb des Übersetzens. Das mag für die meisten wohl klar sein, aber selbst die, die besser wissen, können in Existenzängsten, die das freiberufliche Leben oft begleiten, verwickelt werden und das vergessen oder die notwendige Ruhezeit verschieben. Tu‘ das bloß nicht. Schlaf und Auszeit sind unentbehrliche Bestandteile der Kreativität und Produktivität.

Und wenn wir das vergessen, hoffe ich, dass wir uns auf unsere Freunde und Netzwerke verlassen können, die uns sanft oder auch unsanft daran erinnern. Das ist lebensnotwendig. Letzten Endes – trotz aller Technologie, sprachwissenschaftliches Können und alle bekannte Merkmale unseres Berufes ist das komplette, nachhaltige Dasein als Übersetzer in den wichtigsten Aspekten nicht von anderen Existenzen zu unterscheiden: Gleichgewicht in jeder Hinsicht, auch seelische, soll sein.

Get a life or die.